1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 35 F.3d
  5. 35 F.3d 356 (1994)
 

E.E.O.C. v. CHERRY-BURRELL CORP.

Nos. 93-3475, 93-3647.

35 F.3d 356 (1994)

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff/Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and Sharon Hamblin, Plaintiff-Intervenor/Appellee, v. CHERRY-BURRELL CORP., Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided September 19, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin James Visser, Cedar Rapids, IA, argued (Larry G. Gutz, on the brief), for appellant.

Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellees were Sophia C. Goodman, Washington, DC, argued, for EEOC.

Steven A. Stefani, Cedar Rapids, IA, argued for Hamblin.

James R. Neely, Jr., Gwendolyn Young Reams and Lorraine C. Davis, on the brief, for EEOC.

Before: R. ARNOLD, Chief Judge; WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge; and WELLFORD, Senior Circuit Judge.

WELLFORD, Senior Circuit Judge.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (hereafter "EEOC") filed suit in 1989 against the defendant, Cherry-Burrell Corporation (hereafter "C-B"), seeking equal pay relief under 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) and a sex discrimination award under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5 for Sharon Hamblin, a C-B employee. Hamblin was permitted to intervene in early 1990. After trial, the district court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases