1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 182 Ariz.
  5. 182 Ariz. 203 (1994)
 

THIRD & CATALINA v. CITY OF PHOENIX

No. 1 CA-CV 93-0337.

182 Ariz. 203 (1994)

895 P.2d 115

THIRD & CATALINA ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, City of Phoenix City Council, and City of Phoenix Fire Department, Defendants-Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A.

Review Denied May 23, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

O'Connor, Cavanagh, Anderson, Westover, Killingsworth & Beshears, P.A. by Christopher Robbins, Harding B. Cure, Troy B. Froderman, Phoenix, for plaintiff-appellant.

Roderick G. McDougall, City Atty. by Michael D. House, Asst. City Atty., Phoenix, for defendants-appellees.

OPINION

GRANT, Presiding Judge.

In this appeal we are asked to decide whether a City of Phoenix ordinance1 requiring the retrofitting of Third & Catalina Associates' building with sprinklers is unconstitutional as violating equal protection rights or as a taking without due process of law or just compensation. Third & Catalina Associates ("appellant") appeals from summary judgment of the trial court granted in favor of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases