1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 21 F.3d
  5. 21 F.3d 354 (1994)
 

U.S. v. NAPIER

No. 93-10586.

21 F.3d 354 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vince Albert NAPIER, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided April 12, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene A. Burdick, Mesa, AZ, for defendant-appellant.

Janet Napolitano, U.S. Atty., Georgia B. Ellexson, Chief, Appellate Section, and Stanley L. Patchell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Phoenix, AZ, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Vince Albert Napier appeals his 88-month sentence following entry of a guilty plea to armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d). Napier contends that the district court erred when it calculated his offense level by interpreting "loss" under U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(6) as the amount of money taken during the robbery. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

We review de novo the district court's application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases