1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 69 Ohio
  5. 69 Ohio St.3d 301 (1994)
 

CITY OF CINCINNATI v. HAMILTON CTY. BD. OF REVISION

No. 92-2494.

69 Ohio St.3d 301 (1994)

CITY OF CINCINNATI, APPELLEE, v. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL.; GRANDIN HOUSE, LTD., APPELLANT; CINCINNATI SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 18, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wayne E. Petkovic, for appellant.

Kohnen, Patton & Hunt and David C. DiMuzio, for appellee Cincinnati School District Board of Education.

Fay D. Dupuis, City Solicitor, and Dorothy Carman, Assistant City Solicitor, for appellee the city of Cincinnati.

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Thomas J. Sheve, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee Hamilton County Auditor.

Per Curiam.

The decision of the BTA is affirmed.

In its brief Grandin House argues only that the BTA's decision does not set forth the basis for its determination, in conflict with Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Stark Cty. Bd. of Revision (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 290, 603 N.E.2d 981. We disagree.

The BTA did analyze the evidence and did set forth the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases