We find that plaintiff's attorney's failure to serve a timely answer to defendants' counterclaims was due to his mistaken belief that a reply had already been served, that the brief delay caused defendants no prejudice, and that the affidavit of plaintiff's attorney was adequate for purposes of showing a meritorious defense (see, Epstein v Lenox Hill Hosp.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.