MATTER OF HOV v. DIV. OF HUMAN RES. OF THE BD. OF EDUC. OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK-MED. BUREAU


203 A.D.2d 161 (1994)

610 N.Y.S.2d 787

In the Matter of Darlene Hov, Respondent, v. Division of Human Resources of the Board of Education of the City of New York-Medical Bureau et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 21, 1994


Where medical experts are of differing opinions, the agency's choice of one over another does not constitute arbitrary and capricious conduct (Matter of Talamo v Murphy, 38 N.Y.2d 637).

Moreover, on the record before us, there is no basis found that the respondents' determination was in bad faith.

It establishes that the respondents carefully examined and evaluated petitioner's medical condition, and determined, on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases