Defendant's assertion that his guilt of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20) and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 165.45 [1]) was not proved beyond a reasonable doubt since the evidence regarding identification was legally insufficient is without merit. Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People and giving them the benefit of every reasonable inference (People v Malizia,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. ADAMS
204 A.D.2d 157 (1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 15
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Wayne Adams, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 17, 1994
May 17, 1994
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.