AUSTIN v. AUSTIN


209 A.D.2d 151 (1994)

617 N.Y.S.2d 645

Michael Austin, Respondent-Appellant, v. Pamela Austin, Appellant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 1, 1994


The plaintiff asserts that the judgment varies greatly from the decision after the trial, entered May 14, 1991, and must, therefore, be modified to conform with the decision (see, Di Prospero v Ford Motor Co., 105 A.D.2d 479, 480). While that decision does vary from the judgment in certain respects, most significantly in the provision for visitation, a subsequent decision of the court, dated August 26, 1991, deciding a motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases