MATTER OF COLUMBIA GAS SYSTEM, INC.

Bankruptcy Nos. 91-803, 91-804.

171 B.R. 189 (1994)

In the Matter of the COLUMBIA GAS SYSTEM, INC., and Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Debtors.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware.

August 9, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin Gross, Rosenthal, Monhait, Gross and Goddess, P.A., Wilmington, DE, and James F. Bendernagel, Jr., Larry J. Nyhan and Linda S. Portasik, Sidley & Austin, Washington, DC, for Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.

James L. Patton, Jr., Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, Wilmington, DE, Lewis Kruger and Robin Keller, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan and John P. Hunt, Cravath Swaine & Moore, New York City, for debtors.

Stephen W. Spence, Phillips Goldman & Spence, Wilmington, DE and John J. Dilenschneider, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Columbus, OH, for Columbia Gas of Kentucky, Inc., Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc., Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc., Columbia Gas of Maryland, Inc. and Commonwealth Gas Services, Inc.

Francis J. Trzuskowski, Trzuskowski, Kipp, Kelleher & Pearce, P.A., Wilmington, DE, and Roger M. Whelan, Leslie A. Nicholson, Jr., Alan G. Fishel and Mark H. Berman, Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge, Washington, DC, for Official Committee of Customers of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.

Eileen M. Ford, Froehlich, Healy & Locke, Newark, DE, for Consumer Advocate Div., Public Service Com'n, of West Virginia, Maryland Office of Peoples Counsel, Maryland Public Service Com'n, Ohio Office of Consumers' Counsel, Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate, Pennsylvania Public Utility Com'n and Public Service Com'n of State of N.Y.

Ellen W. Slights, Asst. U.S. Atty., Wilmington, DE, and Stuart Gibson and Karl Fingerhood, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Div., Washington, DC, for I.R.S.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HELEN S. BALICK, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Columbia Gas Transmission Company (TCo) moves this court for an order approving a settlement of TCo's 1990 rate case before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (the settlement motion). TCo's customers, various state agencies, and the cities of Charlottesville and Richmond in Virginia support the motion. Opposed to the motion are the United States of America and the Official Committee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases