SHALITA v. TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON


270 N.J. Super. 84 (1994)

636 A.2d 568

PAUL SHALITA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 1, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hartsough, Kenny, Innes & Kline, attorneys for appellant (Thomas W. Rubino, on the brief).

Respondent submitted a pro se brief.

Before Judges PETRELLA, BAIME and CONLEY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BAIME, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Paul Shalita served a three year term as municipal court judge of defendant Township of Washington. The Township's ordinance provided a salary range for the office of municipal court judge. By resolution, the governing body directed that plaintiff receive a fixed annual salary within that range. At the expiration of his term, plaintiff demanded extra compensation for conducting special sessions. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases