1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 210 A.D.2d
  5. 210 A.D.2d 144 (1994)
 

RAUL CLEANERS CORP. v. KIM'S LANDMARK CLEANERS CORP.

210 A.D.2d 144 (1994)

621 N.Y.S.2d 847

Raul Cleaners Corp. et al., Respondents, v. Kim's Landmark Cleaners Corp. et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 20, 1994

Given the conflicting terms of the parties' agreement and the promissory note regarding plaintiffs' remedies in the event of a default as well as the evident questions of fact regarding the alleged subsequent modification of the agreement and its effect on the note, summary judgment should have been denied. Moreover, inasmuch as it also appears from the affidavits in opposition that there exist possible counterclaims relating to the alleged cash payment at the closing and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases