1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 277 N.J.
  5. 277 N.J. Super. 67 (1994)
 

MUELLENBERG v. BIKON CORP.

277 N.J. Super. 67 (1994)

648 A.2d 1161

RALPH MUELLENBERG AND BIKON-TECHNIK, GMBH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BIKON CORPORATION, DEFENDANT, AND KURT W. BURG, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND ADDA FINANZIARIA, S.R.L. AND DARIO PASSERINI, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 3, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick A. Nicoll argued the cause for appellants Muellenberg and Bikon-Technik (Mr. Nicoll, on the joint brief).

Robert W. Delvanthal argued the cause for appellants Adda Finanziaria and Dario Passerini (Crummy, Del Deo, Dolan, Griffinger & Vecchione, attorneys; Mr. Delventhal, on the joint brief).

Eugene H. Gilmartin argued the cause for respondent (Barry G. Leveen, attorney; Mr. Gilmartin and Melissa Clott Shafner, on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, SKILLMAN and KESTIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KESTIN, J.A.D.

On May 10, 1991, plaintiffs, Muellenberg and Bikon-Technik, GmbH ("BTG") filed a complaint in the Chancery Division seeking dissolution of Bikon Corporation ("Bikon" or "the corporation") pursuant to N.J.S.A. 14A:12-7(1). They also sought injunctive relief from asserted patent and trademark infringements; an accounting with respect to unpaid royalty fees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases