1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 273 N.J.
  5. 273 N.J. Super. 64 (1994)
 

RARITAN PLAZA v. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD

273 N.J. Super. 64 (1994)

640 A.2d 1205

RARITAN PLAZA I ASSOCIATES, L.P., A NEW JERSEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF NEW JERSEY, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 10, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John H. Klock argued the cause for appellant (Crummy, Del Deo, Dolan, Griffinger & Vecchione, attorneys; Mr. Klock, of counsel; Mr. Klock and Ann M. Dooley, on the brief).

Paul Kaufman argued the cause for respondent (Kaufman, Gelbert & Bern, attorneys; Mr. Kaufman, of counsel; Mr. Kaufman and Mitchell H. Klopper, on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, SKILLMAN and WEFING.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, P.J.A.D.

We granted plaintiff Raritan Plaza I Associates, L.P. leave to appeal from an order of the Chancery Division that denied its motion for a preliminary injunction to stay an arbitration proceeding. The arbitration would determine the amount of commissions allegedly due defendant Cushman & Wakefield of New Jersey, Inc. The commissions at issue arise from the renewal of a lease by Prudential Bache, Inc. ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases