Defendant does not dispute that the crimes for which he was indicted actually took place. He urges instead that his various statements and admissions should have been suppressed and that, without these statements and admissions, there was inadequate evidence that he was involved. However, the fact findings made by the trial court were amply supported by the evidence, and there is no basis for not giving them due deference on appeal (People v Prochilo,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. WISE
204 A.D.2d 133 (1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 117
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kharey Wise, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 10, 1994
May 10, 1994
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
