IN RE CONTE

No. 93-5407.

33 F.3d 303 (1994)

In re Dominick P. CONTE, Debtor, Dominick P. CONTE, Appellant v. Urmila GAUTAM; Narinder Gautam; U.S. Trustee, Trustee.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided August 30, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John P. Flanagan, Clapp & Eisenberg, Newark, NJ, for appellant.

Urmila Gautam, pro se.

Before: BECKER, HUTCHINSON and COWEN, Circuit Judges


Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) February 17, 1994.

OPINION OF THE COURT

BECKER, Circuit Judge.

Debtor Dominick Conte, a New Jersey lawyer and the defendant in this case, appeals from a district court order affirming a bankruptcy court order that Conte's debt to plaintiffs Urmila and Narinder Gautam arising from a jury verdict against him in a legal malpractice action was not dischargeable. The bankruptcy court held that the debt was not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases