Plaintiff's complaint seeking damages arising from defendant's payment of a $15,000 license fee to Ho-Tel, Inc., plaintiff's alleged agent, despite plaintiff's notification that it had commenced an action against Ho-Tel for, inter alia, violating the agency agreement, was properly dismissed. The complaint failed to state a cause of action. There is no basis for imposing liability on defendant for fulfilling its contractual obligation...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
