1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 272 N.J.
  5. 272 N.J. Super. 59 (1994)
 

GOLDSTEIN CO. v. BLOOMFIELD PLAZA

272 N.J. Super. 59 (1994)

639 A.2d 347

A.S. GOLDSTEIN COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BLOOMFIELD PLAZA ASSOCIATES, BLOOM REALTY CORP., AND ENTITY XYZ, A BUSINESS ASSOCIATION THE IDENTITY AND LEGAL FORM OF WHICH ARE UNKNOWN TO THE PLAINTIFF, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 31, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Louis Grossman argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Grossman, on the brief).

Alice Beirne argued the cause for respondent (Scarinci & Hollenbeck, attorneys; Alice Beirne, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, DREIER and KLEINER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by DREIER, J.A.D.

Plaintiff, a real estate broker, appeals from a summary judgment dismissing its complaint for a real estate commission based upon plaintiff's negotiation of a proposed lease between defendants, the owners of a strip mall,2 and Blockbuster Video. Plaintiff approached defendants with Blockbuster as a potential tenant and negotiated the terms of a proposed lease for an out-building...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases