1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 15 F.3d
  5. 15 F.3d 313 (1994)
 

TRANSRISK CORP. v. MATSUSHITA ELEC. CORP.

No. 93-1373.

15 F.3d 313 (1994)

TRANSRISK CORPORATION, INCORPORATED, a/k/a Allegheny Freight Lines, Incorporated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a/k/a Panasonic Company, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided January 26, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Joseph L. Steinfeld, Jr., Sims, Walker & Steinfeld, P.C., Washington, DC, for Appellant. Arthur Liberstein, Brodsky, Altman & McMahon, New York City, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Robert B. Walker, John T. Siegler, Scott H. Lyon, Sims, Walker & Steinfeld, P.C., Washington, DC, for Appellant. Ronald G. Dawson, Smith, Somerville & Case, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.

Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge:

Transrisk Corporation, Inc. ("Transrisk"), assignee of Allegheny Freight Lines ("Allegheny"), appeals from a summary judgment denying its "undercharge" claim against Matsushita Electric Corporation d/b/a Panasonic Company ("Panasonic").1 Because we agree with the district court that pursuant to its agreement with Panasonic, Allegheny acted as a motor ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases