1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 204 A.D.2d
  5. 204 A.D.2d 121 (1994)
 

MATTER OF ROZENBAUM v. DESERT PALACE, INC.

204 A.D.2d 121 (1994)

611 N.Y.S.2d 184

In the Matter of Patrice Rozenbaum et al., Respondents, v. Desert Palace, Inc., Appellant, et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 10, 1994

In Desert Palace v Rozenbaum (192 A.D.2d 340, lv denied 82 N.Y.2d 652), this Court decided that attachment of the subject bank account affords quasi in rem jurisdiction over the judgment debtor, and rejected the argument that the bank had any obligation to prevent the judgment debtor from staking money from the subject account on gambling. In the instant action, the issue is the precise allocation of interest in the account...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases