1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 71 Ohio
  5. 71 Ohio St.3d 251 (1994)
 

THOMAS v. NEWARK CITY SCHOOL DIST. BD. OF EDN.

No. 93-256.

71 Ohio St.3d 251 (1994)

THOMAS, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE NEWARK CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 20, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cloppert, Portman, Sauter, Latanick & Foley and Susan Kozlowski, for appellant.

Baker & Hostetler, Ronald G. Linville and Ellen J. Garling, for appellee.

Means, Bichimer, Burkholder & Baker Co., L.P.A., and Kimball H. Carey, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Ohio School Boards Association.

WRIGHT, J.

Richard Thomas argues that the trial court should have ordered the board to reinstate him with back pay, because the written evaluations of Thomas failed to comply with R.C. 3319.111(B)(3). That division provides:

"(B) Any board of education evaluating a teacher pursuant to this section shall adopt evaluation procedures that shall be applied each time a teacher is evaluated pursuant to this section. These evaluation procedures shall include, but...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases