1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 204 A.D.2d
  5. 204 A.D.2d 113 (1994)
 

PEOPLE v. ARTIS

204 A.D.2d 113 (1994)

614 N.Y.S.2d 107

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Clarence Artis, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 10, 1994

Defendant's current claims of error in the prosecutor's summation comments are unpreserved by appropriate objection (see, People v Padro, 75 N.Y.2d 820, 821). In any event, despite an inadvertent reference to "defendant" when the prosecutor clearly intended to refer to a People's witness, there was no attempt by the prosecutor to suggest that defendant carried the burden of calling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases