1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 124 Wn.2d
  5. 124 Wn.2d 193 (1994)
 

BIGGS v. VAIL

No. 59938-6.

124 Wn.2d 193 (1994)

876 P.2d 448

PATRICK BIGGS, Appellant, v. DAVID B. VAIL, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

July 7, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher M. Constantine, for appellant.

Bertha B. Fitzer and William J. Rush, for respondent.

DURHAM, J.

Attorney Patrick Biggs challenges the imposition of civil rule (CR) 11 sanctions by the trial court following the issuance of this court's mandate in Biggs v. Vail, 119 Wn.2d 129, 830 P.2d 350 (1992) (Biggs I). His arguments rest primarily on the assumption that the trial court was without jurisdiction to enter such sanctions after the issuance of the mandate. We disagree...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases