CITY OF HOLLISTER v. McCULLOUGH

Docket No. H010609.

26 Cal.App.4th 289 (1994)

31 Cal. Rptr.2d 415

CITY OF HOLLISTER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MATHILDA FRANCES McCULLOUGH et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

June 3, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Matteoni, Saxe & Nanda, Norman E. Matteoni and Peggy M. O'Laughlin for Defendants and Appellants.

Meyers, Nave, Riback & Silver, Michael F. Rodriguez and Michael R. Nave for Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

MIHARA, J.

Plaintiff initiated an eminent domain action to acquire a portion of defendants' parcel (hereafter the take) for street, sewer and utilities purposes. The trial court granted plaintiff's in limine motion to exclude all evidence of severance damages. After a contested court trial on the value of the take, the court found that the take was worth $22,000. Although defendants presented evidence of the rental...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases