CAVANAUGH v. MORRIS


273 N.J. Super. 38 (1994)

640 A.2d 1192

DANAY CAVANAUGH AND THOMAS CAVANAUGH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. STEPHEN J. MORRIS AND/OR JOHN DOE, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY AND/OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 6, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Hayes and Associates, attorneys for appellants (John J. Armano, Jr., on the brief).

Powell, Birchmeier, Berger & Powell, attorneys for respondent Stephen J. Morris (Lawrence S. Berger, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, DREIER and BROCHIN.


PER CURIAM.

This is another verbal threshold case in which an injured passenger, plaintiff Danay Cavanaugh, whose husband Thomas Cavanaugh sues per quod, appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her complaint. We reverse.

Since the Supreme Court's decision in Oswin v. Shaw, 129 N.J. 290, 609 A.2d 415 (1992), this court has been besieged with appeals by automobile accident victims whose...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases