1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 138 N.J.
  5. 138 N.J. 173 (1994)
 

RUMBAUSKAS v. CANTOR

138 N.J. 173 (1994)

649 A.2d 853

JOHN RUMBAUSKAS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDWARD A. CANTOR, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 30, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shalom D. Stone argued the cause for appellant (Walder, Sondak & Brogan, attorneys; Justin P. Walder and John A. Brogan, of counsel).

Kenneth K. Lehn argued the cause for respondent (Franzblau Dratch, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by O'HERN, Justice.

In an earlier time, the great Judge Wilfred Jayne might have written of this case: "In several of its aspects this cause is an unfashionable one to be introduced to a court * * * for determination." Tami v. Pikowitz, 138 N.J. Eq. 410, 410, 48 A.2d 221 (Ch. 1946). An innocuous rivalry between two suitors of a woman is ordinarily not the business of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases