HYDE v. REYNOLDSVILLE CASKET CO.

No. 92-1682.

68 Ohio St.3d 240 (1994)

HYDE, APPELLANT, v. REYNOLDSVILLE CASKET COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 9, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. Eardley, for appellant.

William E. Riedel, for appellees.

Williams, Jilek, Lafferty & Gallagher Co., L.P.A., and Dale M. Grocki, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.

Brown & Szaller Co., L.P.A., and James F. Szaller, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Brown & Szaller Co., L.P.A.

Spangenberg, Shibley, Traci, Lancione & Liber, Robert A. Marcis and Cathleen M. Bolek, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Spangenberg, Shibley, Traci, Lancione & Liber.

Arter & Hadden, Irene C. Keyse-Walker and Robert C. Tucker, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust.1


PFEIFER, J.

This court is asked to determine whether the United States Supreme Court decision in Bendix Autolite Corp. v. Midwesco Enterprises, Inc. (1988), 486 U.S. 888, 108 S.Ct. 2218, 100 L.Ed.2d 896, holding the Ohio tolling statute, R.C. 2305.15(A), to be unconstitutional, should be retroactively applied to Hyde's complaint filed against RCC and Blosh. For the following reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases