PEOPLE v. SMITH


195 A.D.2d 112 (1994)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Richard Smith, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

January 20, 1994


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miriam J. Hibel of counsel, New York City (Philip L. Weinstein, attorney), for appellant.

Kathleen E. Fay of counsel, New York City (Donald J. Siewert with her on the brief; Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney of New York County, attorney), for respondent.

MURPHY, P. J., WALLACH and KUPFERMAN, JJ., concur.


ASCH, J.

The issue before us is whether declarations against penal interest of a third party, which tended to exculpate the defendant Smith, should have been admitted into evidence. A necessary prerequisite for determination of such an issue is a familiarity with the underlying facts, and so, we set them forth in substantial detail.

At trial, Claudia Johnson testified that on January 24, 1991,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases