HONEY BROOK WATER CO. v. PA. PUC


167 Pa.Commw. 140 (1994)

647 A.2d 653

HONEY BROOK WATER COMPANY, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided August 25, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig A. Doll, for petitioner.

Stanley E. Brown, Asst. Counsel, for respondent.

Before CRAIG, President Judge, and DOYLE, McGINLEY, SMITH, PELLEGRINI, FRIEDMAN and KELLEY, JJ.


DOYLE1, Judge.

Honey Brook Water Company has appealed a decision of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) which denied Honey Brook's exceptions to the order of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) which had sustained the formal complaints of Margaret Shulzitski, Mr. and Mrs. Raymond J. Sakrewsky, Edward T. and Arlene S. Burgess and Bonita Hoats (collectively, Complainants).

Facts

On April 15, 1992, Complainants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases