BADEA v. SENECA INS. CO.


203 A.D.2d 98 (1994)

612 N.Y.S.2d 839

Ruxandra Badea et al., Respondents, v. Seneca Insurance Company et al., Defendants, and Active Fire Extinguisher Co., Inc., Appellant. Seneca Insurance Company, Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Active Fire Extinguisher Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. (And Second and Third Third-Party Actions.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 12, 1994


In light of the fact that the evidence presented on the motion raises material questions concerning, inter alia, whether the instant fire extinguisher was properly installed and situated in the premises and as to what caused the extinguisher to fall, summary judgment was properly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases