HATTIE v. ANDERSON

No. 92-2130.

68 Ohio St.3d 232 (1994)

HATTIE, APPELLANT, v. ANDERSON, WARDEN, ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 9, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terrence W. Hattie, pro se.

Lee Fisher, Attorney General, and Paul J. Buser, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.


Per Curiam.

Appellant's first proposition of law asserts that habeas corpus and/or mandamus is available against the APA because it rescinded an order granting parole out of vindictiveness and in retaliation for his questioning the conditions of parole. R.C. 2967.03 vests discretion in the APA to "grant a parole to any prisoner, if in its judgment there is reasonable ground to believe that * * * such action would further the interests of justice and be consistent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases