1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 273 N.J.
  5. 273 N.J. Super. 23 (1994)
 

DUNELLEN BOR. v. F. MONTECALVO CONTR.

273 N.J. Super. 23 (1994)

640 A.2d 1185

BOROUGH OF DUNELLEN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF, v. F. MONTECALVO CONTRACTING CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND F.I.A. INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS, v. STETLER & GULDIN ENGINEERING, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT/FOURTH PARTY PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, v. BOROUGH OF DUNELLEN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, FOURTH-PARTY DEFENDANT/APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 4, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Gazi argued the cause for appellant Borough of Dunellen (Foley & Gazi, attorneys; Mr. Gazi, on the brief).

Joseph Michelini argued the cause for respondent Stetler & Guldin Engineering, Inc. (O'Malley & Surman, attorneys; Jerome C. Landers, on the brief).

Before Judges BRODY, STERN and KEEFE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BRODY, P.J.A.D.

The Borough of Dunellen (Dunellen) appeals from an order declaring that it must provide for the defense and indemnification of Stetler & Guldin Engineering, Inc. (Stetler), the borough engineer, respecting the claims asserted against Stetler in this action by F. Montecalvo Contracting Co. (Montecalvo). Dunellen acknowledges that it would be obliged to pay Stetler's attorneys fees and expenses had they been...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases