1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 273 N.J.
  5. 273 N.J. Super. 1 (1994)
 

PICKETT v. BEVACQUA

273 N.J. Super. 1 (1994)

640 A.2d 1173

CHERYL PICKETT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PHILIP BEVACQUA AND FRANK BEVACQUA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 2, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sander Perl argued the cause for appellant (Goldstein, Ballen, O'Rourke & Wildstein, attorneys).

William A. Wenzel argued the cause for respondents (Haggerty, Donohue & Monaghan, attorneys).

Before Judges MUIR, Jr., THOMAS, and LEVY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MUIR, JR., J.A.D.

This is a verbal threshold case. After the trial court twice directed the jury to return to deliberations in efforts to avoid a "hopeless" deadlock on the verbal threshold issue, the jury returned a unanimous verdict finding defendant 80% negligent, but five of six jurors rejected plaintiff's verbal threshold claim on the ground the medical testimony did not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases