DEAS v. HUGHES

S93A1335.

264 Ga. 9 (1994)

DEAS et al. v. HUGHES et al.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Reconsideration Denied March 14, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McClure, Ramsay & Dickerson, Allan R. Ramsay, Morris, Manning & Martin, Joseph R. Manning, John P. MacNaughton, for appellants.

Robinson & Harbert, John E. Robinson, for appellees.

Gershon, Olim, Katz & Loeb, Max Olim, amicus curiae.


SEARS-COLLINS, Justice.

The issue on appeal is whether there exists an easement across the property of Rutherford C. Deas and Donna B. Deas, the appellants (hereinafter "Deas"), in favor of Brent E. Hughes and Carolyn C. Hughes, the appellees (hereinafter "Hughes"). We find that the trial court erred in finding that such an easement exists, and, accordingly, we reverse.

L. J. Crumley once owned a tract of land which he subsequently divided into five contiguous...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases