MATTER OF BERKOWITZ


136 N.J. 134 (1994)

642 A.2d 389

IN THE MATTER OF BERNARD S. BERKOWITZ, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW. IN THE MATTER OF JAMES P. DUGAN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 17, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Sweeney, Deputy Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of Office of Attorney Ethics.

Todd M. Sahner argued the cause for respondent Bernard S. Berkowitz (Hannoch Weisman, attorneys).

Dominic J. Aprile argued the cause for respondent James P. Dugan (Bathgate, Wegener, Dugan & Wolf, attorneys).


PER CURIAM.

This attorney disciplinary matter arose from a formal complaint charging two attorneys, partners in a large law firm, with representing two parties with actual or potentially adverse interests. One of the parties was a manufacturing concern whose operations were threatened by a proposed land development sought by the other party.

The case presents the issue whether two attorneys, aware of the different concerns of their respective clients, violated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases