MATTER OF BURGESS


201 A.D.2d 55 (1994)

In the Matter of Timothy K. Burgess, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Seventh Judicial District, Petitioner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

July 15, 1994


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel A. Drake, Rochester, for petitioner.

Timothy K. Burgess, Columbia, South Carolina, respondent pro se.

DENMAN, P. J., GREEN, BALIO, LAWTON and CALLAHAN, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court on December 6, 1965 and maintained an office for the practice of law in Rochester until his suspension on July 13, 1990, for two years and until further order of the Court based on his admitted conversion of client funds (Matter of Burgess, 159 A.D.2d 4). No application for reinstatement has been made.

Subsequent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases