1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 26 Cal.App.4th
  5. 26 Cal.App.4th 217 (1994)
 

FOXBOROUGH v. VAN ATTA

Docket No. A061040.

26 Cal.App.4th 217 (1994)

31 Cal. Rptr.2d 525

FOXBOROUGH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DAVID VAN ATTA et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

June 28, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Liccardo, Rossi, Sturges & McNeil, Ronald R. Rossi and Susan R. Reischl for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Gordon & Reed, Diane R. Crowley and James M. Hanavan for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

CHIN, J.

Foxborough, a general partnership, appeals after the trial court found that the statute of limitations, Code of Civil Procedure section 340.6, barred Foxborough's legal malpractice action.1 Foxborough had sued its former attorney, respondent David Van Atta, alleging that he failed to protect Foxborough's interests in a condominium development transaction.2...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases