BRUNSWICK CORP. v. DIRECTOR, DIV. OF TAXATION


135 N.J. 107 (1994)

638 A.2d 805

BRUNSWICK CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 30, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles M. Costenbader and Paul H. Frankel argued the cause for appellant (Stryker, Tams & Dill, attorneys; Charles H. Friedrich, on the briefs).

Margaret A. Holland, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Fred DeVesa, Acting Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Joseph L. Yannotti, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).


PER CURIAM.

Brunswick Corporation challenges the authority of the Director of the Division of Taxation (Director) to adopt a regulation, N.J.A.C. 18:7-8.5(b), that adjusts the manner of calculating franchise taxes under the New Jersey Corporation Business Tax Act (CBTA). The CBTA assesses a franchise tax on all corporations doing business in New Jersey according to a business allocation factor that measures a corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases