1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 23 F.3d
  5. 23 F.3d 218 (1994)
 

DUBINKA v. JUDGES OF SUPERIOR COURT

No. 92-55736.

23 F.3d 218 (1994)

Michael DUBINKA; John F. Coleman; Raul Meza, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JUDGES OF the SUPERIOR COURT OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA for the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; Daniel Lungren, Attorney General of the State of California; Ira Reiner, District Attorney of Los Angeles County, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided April 8, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry J. Hall, Deputy Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Frederick R. Bennett, Asst. County Counsel, Donald E. de Nicola, Deputy Attorney Gen., Los Angeles, CA, for defendants-appellees.

Before: FLETCHER, PREGERSON and HALL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge FLETCHER.

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Michael Dubinka, John Coleman, and Raul Meza appeal the district court's order dismissing their action for declaratory and injunctive relief for failure to state a claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). The district court abstained under the doctrine established in Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases