1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 848 F.Supp.
  5. 848 F.Supp. 1548 (1994)
 

BROOKS v. STATE BD. OF ELECTIONS

Civ. A. No. CV288-146.

848 F.Supp. 1548 (1994)

Tyrone BROOKS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, et al., Defendants, and Donald Cheeks, et al., Intervenors.

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Brunswick Division.

March 7, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laughlin McDonald, Kathleen L. Wilde, Neil Bradley, ACLU, Atlanta, GA, J. Gerald Hebert, Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Div., Washington, DC, for plaintiffs and counter-defendants.

Stanley Curtis House, Charles Leslie Wilkinson, III, Augusta, GA, for intervenors-plaintiffs and cross-claimants.

William Jacob Cobb, David Frank Walbert, Walbert & Herman, Carol Atha Cosgrove, Atlanta, GA, for defendants.

Edmund Booth, pro se.

Donna M. Murphy, Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Div., Voting Section, Washington, DC, for U.S.

Thomas R. Burnside, Jr., pro se.

J. Taylor Phillips, pro se.

Harold A. Johnson, pro se.

A.C. Guhl, pro se.

Walter C. McMillan, Jr., pro se.

Harold D. McLendon, pro se.

Verna L. Smith, pro se.

Warren McLendon, pro se.

I.G. Dawson, Sr., pro se.

Harold Alexander, Atlanta, GA, for Emma L. Adams.

Diane Marie Morrell, Allen & Perry, Savannah, GA, Randal A. Mangham, Atlanta, GA, for Georgia Alliance of African-American Attys.

Harold Alexander, pro se.

Randal Mangham, pro se.

David Frank Walbert, Walbert & Herman, Atlanta, GA, for cross-defendants.

ORDER

EDENFIELD, Chief Judge.

Currently before the Court are the joint motion of the Defendants and the Plaintiffs for approval of their proposed settlement agreement and a motion by the Intervenors for summary judgment. For the reasons stated herein, both motions are DENIED.

Background

Plaintiffs filed this action in 1988 challenging several aspects of the Georgia judicial system under the United States Constitution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases