1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 20 F.3d
  5. 20 F.3d 216 (1994)
 

PIPER v. GOODWIN

No. 93-5051.

20 F.3d 216 (1994)

Paul P. PIPER, Jr., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellee, v. Daniel P. GOODWIN; C. Eugene Good-win; A.S. Hart, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs/Appellants, Ronald K. Moore, Counter-Defendant/Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided March 29, 1994.

Rehearing Denied May 2, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Alan Hanover and James R. Newsom, III (argued and briefed), Hanover, Walsh, Jalenak & Blair, Memphis, TN, for plaintiff-appellee.

Donald W. Pemberton (argued and briefed), Memphis, TN, for defendants-appellants.

Andrew R. Carr, Jr., Shuttleworth, Smith, McNabb & Williams, Memphis, TN, for defendant-appellee.

Before: KENNEDY and GUY, Circuit Judges; and FEIKENS, Senior District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Tennessee's version of the Uniform Commercial Code, the plaintiff sued three individual defendants for collection on two promissory notes. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff and the district court entered a judgment against the defendants on the notes, together with interest and attorney fees. Five issues have been raised on appeal. After reviewing these issues, we find no error and affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases