1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 843 F.Supp.
  5. 843 F.Supp. 1512 (1994)
 

STEDMAN v. HOOGENDOORN, TALBOT

No. 92 C 5670.

843 F.Supp. 1512 (1994)

W. David STEDMAN, Plaintiff, v. HOOGENDOORN, TALBOT, DAVIDS, GODFREY & MILLIGAN, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

February 18, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James K. Meguerian & Ann H. Theodore, D'Ancora & Pflaum, Chicago, IL, for Stedman.

Mary Kay Scott & Dennis G. Gianopolus, Bullaro, Carton, & Stone, Chicago, IL, for Ed Willey.

George W. Spellmire & Maureen R. Lennon, Hinshaw & Culbertson, Chicago, IL, for Hoogendoorn.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

Remaining defendants Hoogendoorn, Talbot, Davids, Godfrey & Milligan (a Chicago law firm referred to here as "Hoogendoorn Firm") and Edward Willey d/b/a Edward Willey Commercial Investigations ("Willey") have moved for summary judgment in this multi-count diversity-of-citizenship action brought against them by W. David Stedman ("Stedman"). Their motions target all of Stedman's claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases