Per Curiam.
Y & O contests the appellate court's decision to return the cause for further consideration and amended order. Claimant contests the court's refusal to order the commission to expressly consider the rehabilitation report and issue an amended order. Only claimant's challenge is found persuasive.
This case falls squarely under State ex rel. Fultz v. Indus. Comm. (1994),
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.