NAYLOR v. CARDINAL LOCAL SCHOOL DIST. BD. OF EDN.

No. 92-2043.

69 Ohio St.3d 162 (1994)

NAYLOR, APPELLANT, v. CARDINAL LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 27, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Green, Haines, Sgambati Murphy & Macala Co., L.P.A. Ronald G. Macala, Cornelius J. Baasten and Anne Piero-Silagy, for appellant.

Christley, Herington, Pierce, Silver & Habowski, Leigh E. Herington and Susan S. McGown, for appellee.

Means, Bichimer, Burkholder & Baker Co., L.P.A., and Kimball H. Carey, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Ohio School Boards Association.


A. WILLIAM SWEENEY, J.

In resolving the instant appeal, we are guided by the standard that R.C. 3319.11 and 3319.111 are remedial statutes that must be liberally construed in favor of teachers. R.C. 1.11. See, also, State ex rel Luckey v. Etheridge (1992), 62 Ohio St.3d 404, 406, 583 N.E.2d 960, 962. One of the issues presented in the instant cause has been resolved by one of the two companion cases to this action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases