STANDING COMMITTEE ON DISCIPLINE v. YAGMAN

No. CV 92-6448 ER, JGD, DWW.

856 F.Supp. 1395 (1994)

STANDING COMMITTEE ON DISCIPLINE of the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner, v. Stephen YAGMAN, Respondent.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

July 8, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert F. Lewis, Graham E. Berry, Michael Silk, Matthew D. Berger, of Lewis, D'Amato, Brisbois & Bisgaard, Los Angeles, CA, for petitioner.

Ramsey Clark, New York City, Marion Yagman, Yagman & Yagman, Venice, CA, for respondent.

Before RAFEEDIE, District Judge, DAVIES, District Judge, and WILLIAMS, Senior District Judge.


MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING SANCTION

PER CURIAM:

On May 18, 1994, this Panel issued its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Thereon (hereinafter "Findings of Fact"), holding that Respondent violated Local Rule 2.5.2 by impugning the integrity of the court and by interfering with the random assignment of cases to the judges of this court. In essence, Respondent attempted to reduce the pool of judges to whom his cases could be assigned by publicly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases