STANDING COMMITTEE ON DISCIPLINE v. YAGMAN

No. CV 94-6448 ER, JGD, DWW.

856 F.Supp. 1384 (1994)

STANDING COMMITTEE ON DISCIPLINE OF the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner, v. Stephen YAGMAN, Respondent.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

May 18, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert F. Lewis, Graham E. Berry, Michael Silk, Matthew D. Berger of Lewis, D'Amato, Brisbois & Bisgaard, Los Angeles, CA, for petitioner.

Ramsey Clark, Lawrence W. Schilling, New York City, Marion Yagman, Yagman & Yagman, Venice, CA, for respondent.

Before RAFEEDIE and DAVIES, District Judges, and DAVID W. WILLIAMS, Senior District Judge.


FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER THEREON

PER CURIAM:

On August 13 and September 10, 1993, this three-judge panel conducted hearings on its Order to Show Cause why Respondent, attorney Stephen Yagman, should not be disciplined pursuant to the Local Rules of the Central District of California. The Panel has reviewed the evidence presented by the parties and the written arguments of counsel. In this order, the Panel finds that the Respondent violated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases