1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 851 F.Supp.
  5. 851 F.Supp. 1382 (1994)
 

QUANTUM CORP. v. RODIME PLC

Civ. No. 4-93-214.

851 F.Supp. 1382 (1994)

QUANTUM CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. RODIME PLC, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.

April 11, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terence M. Fruth, Douglas L. Elsass, and Fruth & Anthony, P.A., Minneapolis, and John F. Lynch, Richard L. Stanley, J. Mike Amerson, and Arnold, White & Durkee, Houston, TX, for plaintiff.

Robert V. Atmore, and Lindquist & Vennum, Minneapolis, and Margaret K. Pfeiffer, Thomas R. Leuba, Alice S. Fisher, and Sullivan & Cromwell, and John C. Altmiller, and Kenyon & Kenyon, Washington, DC, for defendant.

ORDER

DOTY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on plaintiff Quantum Corporation's motion for partial summary judgment. Based on a review of the file, record, and proceedings herein, the court grants the motion.

BACKGROUND

This matter involves the alleged invalidity of defendant Rodime PLC's ("Rodime") patent, U.S. Patent No. Bl 4,638,383 ("'383 patent") entitled "Micro Hard-Disk Drive System". The patent describes a micro-winchester...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases