1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 883 P.2d
  5. 883 P.2d 1338 (1994)
 

IN THE MATTER OF ROCHAT v. ROCHAT

9305-90736; CA A82273.

883 P.2d 1338 (1994)

131 Or. App. 261

In the Matter of the Guardianship/Conservatorship for William C. Rochat, an Incapacitated/Protected Person. William C. ROCHAT, Appellant, v. Mary Ellen ROCHAT and Anna L. Carlson, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 2, 1994.

Review Denied December 27, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Carl Rochat argued the cause and filed the brief pro se.

James R. Cartwright, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and LANDAU, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals from two orders of the Multnomah County Circuit Court, one appointing guardians for petitioner and the other appointing conservators. We reject petitioner's arguments concerning the guardianship. The respondents concede that they did not request a conservatorship and that the trial court, under the pleadings, should not have appointed conservators.

Order appointing conservators reversed; order appointing guardians...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases