BOHM v. OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

9101783CV; CA A76069.

868 P.2d 1344 (1994)

126 Or. App. 281

Harold D. BOHM, Appellant, v. OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 9, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Darris K. Rowell, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Olson, Rowell & Walsh.

Douglas F. Zier, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.


ROSSMAN, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant Oregon Institute of Technology (OIT) in his action for breach of an employment contract arising out of OIT's alleged failure and refusal to consider him eligible for promotion and salary increases. He contends that the trial court erred as a matter of law in granting summary judgment to OIT on the ground that his cause of action accrued more than six years before the filing of the complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases