1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 849 F.Supp.
  5. 849 F.Supp. 1335 (1994)
 

ALTMANN v. TELEVISION SIGNAL CORP.

No. C 94-0071 VRW.

849 F.Supp. 1335 (1994)

Madeleine ALTMANN, Michael Freeman dba Oranj Productions, Jennifer Locke, Rodney O'Neal Austin, Thomas Inouye, Daniel Kleman, John M. Kaman, and Kristin Atkins, on behalf of themselves and the general public, Plaintiffs, v. TELEVISION SIGNAL CORPORATION, dba Viacom Cable and/or Viacom Cablevision of San Francisco, a California Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

March 30, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher P. Witteman, Susan D. Hyman, Law Offices of Christopher P. Witteman, David S. Kahn, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiffs.

Richard R. Patch, Jeffrey G. Knowles, Rachelle Desvaux, Coblentz, Cahen, McCabe & Breyer, San Francisco, CA, for defendants.

BACKGROUND

CAULFIELD, District Judge.

Defendant Television Signal Corporation ("Viacom") is the monopoly provider of cable television services to approximately 161,000 households in San Francisco. Marx Decl., ¶ 2. The 1988 amendment of the franchise agreement between Viacom and the City of San Francisco provided that Viacom "shall continue to provide an opportunity for public expression by the continuation of ... public access on Channel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases