Beattie, J.
In this case, we are asked to decide (1) whether the trial judge erred by denying plaintiff's request for ruling No. 18, and (2) whether the trial judge erred in denying plaintiff's motion for a new trial.
The facts necessary to decide these issues are as follows: On May 25, 1985, plaintiff experienced a flash in her eye. She received medical advice telling her to be careful and not hit her head. On May 31, 1985, plaintiff parked her car on the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
